Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ITKIN Nick (Nikita) B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 2 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 3 | CHAMLEY-WATSON Miles C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 3 | GASSNER Ethan I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 5 | KUMBLA Sidarth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 6 | CHUNG Andrew N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 7 | KIEFER Axel M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 8 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 9 | ORTS Lucas E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 57% |
| 9 | LOUIE Bryce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 11 | BARMANN Samuel (Sam) I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 12 | PAIK Joon K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | KNODT Julian P. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
| 14 | MACHOVEC Andrew C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 15 | OLIVARES Marcello G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 16 | HADLER David J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 17 | MATHIEU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 17 | EMMER Chase T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 19 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | KANESHIGE Brian K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | |
| 21 | SHIN Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 22 | BRAVO Kenji U. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 23 | DAYTON Draper | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | IVERSON Shane D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 25 | CHEN James P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 26 | PAIK Hyun K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | WANG Brian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 28 | WOODS Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% |
| 29 | ZAKHARIKOV Anton | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LEVY Jasper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 31 | DANIEL Ashton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 32 | TICHACEK Matthew J. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CONDIFF Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% |
| 34 | CHEN Raymond | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 35 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | LEVIN Nestor R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 37 | WONG Robert (Bobby) B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 38 | YU Eric W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% |
| 40 | MOELIS Samuel (Sam) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 41 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% |
| 42 | HUANG Bin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 42 | KUCEBA Vitalijs | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 44 | ANDRADE Nicholas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 45 | DING Allan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 47 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | RICCIO Frank J. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | CANNON Caiden C. | 100% | 87% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 53 | GRUBER Samuel T. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | ZHENG Andrew R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 8% |
| 55 | HU James (Jimmy) Y. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 57 | BAE Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 58 | HODGES Carter F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
| 59 | JOHNSON Cole B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 60 | HADLER Benjamin N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 62 | HOLMES Stuart S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 63 | DORITY Philip S. | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 65 | HOLMES Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
| 65 | MCKENNA Joseph (Owen) O. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 67 | LIAO Jun Heng (James) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 68 | DING Andrew Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
| 69 | KONG Kenneth | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 70 | MITBERG Gregory W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 71 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | BOURTIS James S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 73 | YEE Maxwell J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 73 | GRIFFITH Jordan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 75 | PARKINS Benjamin B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 76 | GRASS Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 76 | HOSSFELD Finn E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 76 | LUTAR Lucas N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 79 | BERMENDER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% |
| 80 | SENIC Anatolie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 81 | DEBACK Maximus (Max) X. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 82 | GRIFFIN John O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 12% |
| 83 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | 1% |
| 84 | REALS Alden D. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 85 | MARINO Joseph A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 86 | LOPEZ Carlos D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 87 | MCGILLION-MOORE Jake | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 88 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 89 | CHEN Ziyuan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 90 | PALAZZOLO William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% |
| 91 | LIU Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 92 | LI Brandon H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 93 | JEON Nathan S. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 94 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | LU Kerry L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 96 | LEE Benjamin H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 97 | MILLER Jeffrey E. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 98 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 99 | KAISER Hans Z. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 100 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | SAMORA Jose G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 102 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 103 | CAO Leon M. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 104 | BURTE Alexander J. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | TESCHE Askhat D. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | GORDON Jacob | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 106 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 108 | GAZIANO William F. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 109 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 109 | SPEVAK Alexander | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 111 | CHENG Thomas C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 112 | UPTON Michael | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 113 | CANDESCU Cristian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 114 | HERGAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 115 | RANADIVE Rishi R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 116 | KOECK Tomas E. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 117 | ZHOU TIMMY | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 119 | GRASSE Ellis A. | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 120 | LEWICKI Max | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 121 | FIELD Miles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 121 | ROMANOV Michael | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 123 | SMITH Liam C. | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 124 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 125 | MORAIS Paulo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 126 | ADLER David R. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 126 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 93% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 128 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | TIERNEY David A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 130 | YANG Adam | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 131 | PANAGIEV Stefan-Damian D. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 133 | LIU Jonathan C. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 134 | PETER Griffin | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 134 | KELLY William J. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 136 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 137 | GAUDET Paul D. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 137 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 139 | HU Oliver W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% |
| 140 | TRASCHENKO POCHMARA Jacob | 100% | 91% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 141 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 97% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 142 | WU Albert | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 142 | PATEL Aryoman M. | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 144 | COOK John J. | 100% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 145 | WETMORE Lucas W. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 146 | ZILINSKIY Eduard | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 147 | HAY Gavin | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 149 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | 100% | 85% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 92% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 151 | KNIGHT Ethan H. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 152 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 153 | OUELLETTE David M. | 100% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.