Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 11% | |
2 | BURKE Nora S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
3 | AKSAMIT Monica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
3 | STONE Anne-Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
5 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 40% |
6 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
7 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
8 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 34% | |
9 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
10 | RUSSO Francesca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
11 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
12 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
13 | MERZA Sarah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
14 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
15 | HARRILL Gillian N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | 4% |
16 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
17 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 3% |
18 | GRENCH Eileen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 5% |
19 | GORMAN Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
19 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
21 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
22 | BABY Sada M. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
23 | JOHNSON Honor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
24 | JENKINS Morgan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
25 | YUN Joy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
26 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | |
27 | MICHEL Violet N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% | |
28 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
29 | MERZA Celina | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
31 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | LITYNSKI Jacqueline Z. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
33 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
34 | MOSS Zara J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
35 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 5% |
36 | MILLER Tiffany D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
37 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 24% | |
38 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
39 | WHITE Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
40 | MORALES Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
41 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
42 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
43 | SAPIENZA Lindsay | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
44 | LARGAESPADA Fatima | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
45 | BENTOLILA Esther | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
46 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 6% | - | |
47 | TURNER Zoe Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
48 | DECKER Laura | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
49 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
50 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
51 | HASSETT Tara A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
52 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
53 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
53 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
55 | MAJOR Desirae A. | 100% | 96% | 54% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
56 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
57 | WITEK Sophie B. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
57 | LIMB Madeline I. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
59 | HILADO Sarah | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
60 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
61 | SAYLES Nina R. | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
62 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
63 | KOLMYKOVA Aleksandra | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
64 | CHAN Casey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
65 | MILLER Stephanie M. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
66 | WOZNIAK Kelli | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
67 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
68 | BROWNE Alexis G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 4% |
69 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
70 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
71 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
72 | BUSTAMANTE Evie I. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
73 | WALTER Zsofia R. | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
74 | MENTZER Katherine | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
75 | SULLIVAN Caroline E. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - | |
76 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
77 | SHVARTSMAN Rochelle | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
78 | CHAN Leanne | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
79 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
80 | AKARD Micah M. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
81 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
83 | BECKER Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
84 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
85 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | |
86 | HASSAN Aziza R. | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | - | |
88 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
89 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
90 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
90 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
92 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.