Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | V D V V V | V V V V V | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 2 | FALLICK Ozzie | V V V D D | V V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 3 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | V V D V D | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 3 | QIU Le | D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 5 | DOARES Andrew | V D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 6 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | V D V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 7 | MOORE Evan M. | V D V V D | V V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 8 | LUEBBE Macklan C | D V D D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 9 | LIMB Matthew G. | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | JONES Graham H. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | MURTHY mukund | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 12 | MONTGOMERY Jadon T. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | CHO Brandon | V D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | WESLER Logan A. | D V V D D | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 15 | BULANOV Alex Z. | V D D D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 16 | HUDDY Brandon J. | D D D V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | MATHARU Sukhveer | V V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 18 | RICH Augustus (Gus) G. | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | HOLMES Aiden G. | V V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | DESAI Drewv D. | V V D V V D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 22 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | V D V V V D | D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 23 | WOOD Elden S. | D V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | PARKER Timothy S. | D V D V V V | D | 1.2 | 4 | +2.8 |
| 25 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | WU Nicholas R. | D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 27 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | D D V V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 28 | ALLUM Christopher T. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 29 | MYERS Kaleb S. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 30 | HANEY Vincent | D D D V D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 31 | PEAGLER Cameron | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | KARNES Jameson D. | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | GILLIGAN Wolff | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | LIU Edward H. | V V D D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 35 | CACERES Hernan | D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 36 | PATRICK Timothy M. | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | HUANG Zekai | D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | WUN William | D D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 39 | HICHA Paul R. | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 40 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 41 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 42 | HWANG Ryan C. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 43 | HU Xueyu (Jack) | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 44 | MALDARI Frank | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.