Livingston, NJ - Livingston, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | ||
| 1 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 2% | 6% | 12% | 18% | 21% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 2% | 1% | - | - |
| 2 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 8% | 15% | 23% | 24% | 18% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | MIKA Casper | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 15% | 23% | 25% | 18% | 7% | 1% |
| 4 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 13% | 19% | 21% | 18% | 11% | 5% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 5 | CHO Brandon | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 9% | 15% | 20% | 20% | 15% | 9% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 6 | MORREALE John | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 9% | 16% | 21% | 21% | 15% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 18% | 22% | 20% | 14% | 7% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 8 | GILES Jeremy M. | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 8% | 14% | 19% | 21% | 17% | 10% | 5% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 9 | TANG Albert | 1% | 9% | 21% | 29% | 23% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | ||||||||
| 10 | YEN Preston | - | 1% | 4% | 14% | 24% | 27% | 19% | 8% | 2% | - | - | |||||||
| 11 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 1% | 8% | 19% | 28% | 24% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - | - | ||||||||
| 13 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 7% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| 15 | GOSALIA Rishab | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | ||||||||||||
| 16 | SZEWCZYK Thomas D. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | ||||||||||||
| 18 | BENSON Colin | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | ||||||||||||
| 19 | CORTEZ Christopher | 35% | 46% | 17% | 1% | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 20 | FAN Andrew | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | ||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.