Livingston, NJ - Livingston, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ||
| 1 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 4% | 10% | 16% | 21% | 20% | 14% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 2 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 18% | 23% | 21% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 23% | 30% | 23% | 8% | |
| 4 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 5% | 11% | 19% | 24% | 21% | 13% | 5% | 1% |
| 5 | LIU Rachel | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 9% | 16% | 21% | 20% | 15% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 6 | EDGINGTON Grace | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 8% | 15% | 20% | 21% | 16% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 7 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 18% | 22% | 20% | 14% | 7% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 8 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | - | - | 3% | 9% | 18% | 24% | 22% | 14% | 6% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 9 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | - | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 22% | 28% | 23% | 11% | 2% | - | ||||||||
| 10 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | - | 3% | 10% | 21% | 27% | 22% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | |||||||
| 11 | DANK Dina | 1% | 8% | 22% | 30% | 23% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| 12 | MADA Skye | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 13 | SHIH Christina | 2% | 11% | 25% | 30% | 21% | 9% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| 15 | WU Michelle | 17% | 42% | 33% | 8% | - | - | |||||||||||||
| 16 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 49% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||||
| 18 | PANADIWAL Vedricha | 25% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |||||||||||||
| 19 | SOLONDZ Caroline A. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.