Livingston, NJ - Livingston, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ||
1 | SHEN Jasmine N. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 21% | 30% | 26% | 10% | ||||
2 | CHO Lorin Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 12% | 20% | 23% | 19% | 11% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | ||||
3 | YUGOV Elizabeth | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 14% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 9% | 3% | - |
4 | PO Edith | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 14% | 20% | 23% | 18% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | |
5 | LEE Alison | - | - | 2% | 6% | 14% | 22% | 24% | 18% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |||||
6 | KANIUK Rachel | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 14% | 20% | 21% | 17% | 10% | 5% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
8 | CHEN Georgia M. | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | |||||
9 | BHAN Zala | - | 2% | 8% | 21% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 3% | - | - | ||||||||||
10 | JULIUS Sonia | - | 3% | 11% | 22% | 26% | 21% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |||||||
12 | GOLDSON Jordyn V. | - | 3% | 13% | 25% | 29% | 20% | 8% | 2% | - | |||||||||||
13 | LING Michelle | 13% | 32% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
14 | LEWARS Kaitlyn | - | 3% | 10% | 21% | 26% | 22% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
15 | CLOWES Madison | 17% | 43% | 33% | 8% | ||||||||||||||||
20 | KLEIN Evie R. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.