La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TOLEDO AMES Julieta Isabel | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
2 | LEE Alexandra B. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
3 | YAP Madeline | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
3 | CHIN Erika J. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
5 | SONG Jenny | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
6 | LIANG Megan | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
7 | TANG Catherine H. | D V V D D V | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
8 | CAO Stephanie X. | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
9 | WANG Caroline Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
10 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
10 | LIMB Madeline I. | V V D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
12 | VESTEL Mira B. | V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | ZHOU Monique L. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
14 | WANG Elsabella Y. | D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
15 | MILLER Tiffany D. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
16 | YONG Erika E. | V D D D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
17 | HILL Julia W. | V D V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
18 | YONG Annika A. | V V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
19 | LACSON Sarah | V D V V V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
20 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | D D V V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
20 | CHOU Dana C. | V V V V D D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
22 | SHIN Andrea Y. | V V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
23 | CHAN Audrey | V D V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
24 | HE Charlotte | D V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
25 | KIM Emily | D D V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
26 | KONG Isabel | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
27 | SEAL Julie T. | V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
28 | COIMBRA Miya Y. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
29 | TOM Kristen Noelle C. | V D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
30 | GEYER Carolina M. | D V D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
31 | LEE Erin Y. | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
33 | CODY Alexandra C. | D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
34 | SARISH Dylan H. | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
35 | LIM Isabel K. | D D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
36 | STROUD Linda K. | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
37 | MARSEE Samantha | D D D V D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
38 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
39 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
39 | HUANG Tina | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
41 | GOMES Gisela | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.