The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Music City Series #2

Div III Mixed Foil

Sunday, January 12, 2020 at 4:30 PM

Music City Fencing Club - Nashville, TN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 ZHAO Dylan L. - - 1% 11% 40% 47%
2 WALKER-JONES Ethan - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
3 LIM Samuel - - - 4% 28% 67%
3 TUGGY Sam 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 5%
5 COVER Harrison - 1% 8% 37% 48% 6%
6 LIM Joshua - 3% 18% 40% 31% 8%
7 JONES Nate - 4% 21% 43% 28% 4%
8 PANTIN Dominique L. 3% 19% 38% 29% 9% 1%
9 PALMAFFY Sean - - - 3% 34% 63%
10 FRIEDENBERGER Jacob 2% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
11 JACOBSON Leah 2% 14% 33% 34% 14% 2%
12 CURTIS William K. - - 3% 17% 42% 37%
13 KNOPF Jenna G. 4% 21% 39% 29% 7% -
14 EDWARDS Darby 2% 14% 34% 34% 13% 2%
15 AMMON Blue 4% 24% 40% 25% 6% -
16 GRAY Martha R. 12% 36% 36% 14% 2% -
17 COLLUM Thomas 3% 19% 39% 31% 9% -
18 ADIBZADEH Mehrdad - 4% 19% 36% 31% 10%
19 FOYE Clay 1% 7% 27% 41% 23% 1%
20 SYKES Lauren 10% 30% 36% 19% 5% -
21 USELTON Kaden 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% -
22 LIM Lance Jeremiah 13% 43% 33% 10% 1% -
23 BRAINERD Jim 18% 41% 31% 9% 1% -
24 LANDMAN Charlotte 13% 38% 35% 13% 2% -
25 SORRELLS Brea 32% 49% 19% 1% - -
26 SUERSTEDT Haydn 1% 40% 45% 13% 1% -
27 GUKASOVA Anastasia 3% 23% 41% 26% 6% -
28 BURT Stephen 15% 41% 32% 10% 1% -
29 WILSON Ronald F. 8% 33% 41% 16% 2% -
30 TUGGY Candise 7% 39% 39% 14% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.