Music City Fencing Club - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ZHAO Dylan L. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
2 | WALKER-JONES Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
3 | LIM Samuel | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
3 | TUGGY Sam | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
5 | COVER Harrison | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 48% | 6% |
6 | LIM Joshua | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
7 | JONES Nate | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 4% |
8 | PANTIN Dominique L. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
9 | PALMAFFY Sean | - | - | - | 3% | 34% | 63% |
10 | FRIEDENBERGER Jacob | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
11 | JACOBSON Leah | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
12 | CURTIS William K. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
13 | KNOPF Jenna G. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - |
14 | EDWARDS Darby | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
15 | AMMON Blue | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
16 | GRAY Martha R. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
17 | COLLUM Thomas | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | - |
18 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
19 | FOYE Clay | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 1% |
20 | SYKES Lauren | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
21 | USELTON Kaden | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
22 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 13% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | BRAINERD Jim | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
25 | SORRELLS Brea | 32% | 49% | 19% | 1% | - | - |
26 | SUERSTEDT Haydn | 1% | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
27 | GUKASOVA Anastasia | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
28 | BURT Stephen | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
29 | WILSON Ronald F. | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - |
30 | TUGGY Candise | 7% | 39% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.