Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MA Alexander | V | V V | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 2 | TIAN Charlie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | HEWES Thomas G. | V | V | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 3 | ZHAO Jesse | V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 5 | MCLEAN Miles K. | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 6 | LIGH Thomas | D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 7 | SHA Yi Peng | V | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 8 | VENKATESH Aditya | D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 9 | WONG Anthony Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | BAO Chris W. | D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 11 | O'CONNOR Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | XU Shizhing Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | XU Frankilin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | GOLDMAN Mesafint Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | BIJU Rohan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | MARKS Skyler Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | ZHANG Evan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | DUVAL Theodore Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | CHAHINE Dani Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | GORDON Moses Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | BARETT Kieran Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | PINGLE Kartik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.