La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Shawn J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 2 | PARK Justin W. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 1% | |
| 3 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 3 | MA Jonathan D. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 47% |
| 5 | DINU Nicholas D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 6 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 7 | TRINH Trevor Z. | 5% | 35% | 43% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | YANG Kevin S. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 48% | 26% | |
| 9 | FLORES Gerardo (Gerardito) D. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 10 | CHOU Stephen C. | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 56% | |
| 11 | SOHN Kevin J. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | SOHN Joshua C. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | LEE Kevin H. | - | 1% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | CHU Sean L. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 15 | EMIR PUTRA Syed Adam | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 16 | LIMAYE Dhruv | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
| 17 | LIANG Connor | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 18 | LIMB Matthew G. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 19 | WINKLER Lucas G. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
| 20 | FLORES Peter D. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | MARSEE James | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | BALDAUF Frederick (Fritz) P. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 50% | 14% | |
| 26 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% | |
| 27 | COPELAND Oliver E. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 28 | REESE Aaron S. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KANG Brandon M. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | LI Joshua L. | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 31 | HU William | 2% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LIU David J. | 18% | 44% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | CHANG Nigel | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 34 | KIM Benjamin H. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
| 36 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | KOUNALAKIS Evangelos T. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
| 37 | RAJA Arnav | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 40 | CHAN Andrew M. | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | YOUNG Nash | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
| 42 | RUNDLETT Jakob C. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | BARBER William S. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | RAY Alexander K. | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | SINGER Carson | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 48 | BIAGIOTTI Elliot A. | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | ORPILLA Apolo A. | 5% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | VAUGHN Justin T. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | SWORDS Evan F. | 23% | 48% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | VAUGHN Michael R. | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | BAUER Hank E. | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | COLEMAN Zachary | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | REED Samuel J. | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | DAVIS Alexander N. | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | VILLA-KOWAL Ivan H. | 19% | 52% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.