Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 2 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 3 | FUNG Carina W. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | KANG Jiyoon | 1% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 8% | |
| 5 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 6 | RINGACH Galit | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 7 | CHEW Alexis T. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 8 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | HO Rachel E. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 10 | SHUM Elizabeth | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 11 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 12 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | TOM Caitlyn | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
| 14 | OTEYZA Camille | 11% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 15 | HAAKONSEN Malia | 21% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | HAAKONSEN Jade | 15% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.