Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 47% | 29% |
| 2 | RAJA Arnav | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 3 | TANN Justin | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 3 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 5 | HASNAH Henry | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 6 | REYES Xavier M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 7 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% |
| 8 | VO Minh Q. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | VILLA-KOWAL Ivan H. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 10 | WALLACE Taylor | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 11 | BAUER Hank E. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 12 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 13 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 14 | STONE Esmond A. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | BRISTOL Brijen | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 17 | LEITH Jack | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 18 | REED Samuel J. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | LEUNG Nathan | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | BURNS Caleb | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | SIVAKUMAR Ashwin | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.