Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
2 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
3 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
3 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
5 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% | |
6 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
7 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
8 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
9 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
10 | LAU Jeremy Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
11 | NATANOV David I. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
12 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
13 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
14 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
15 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
16 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
17 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
18 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
19 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
20 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
21 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
22 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
23 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
24 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
25 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
26 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - |
27 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
28 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
29 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
30 | KOVACS Christian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
31 | JUN Ryan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
31 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
33 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
34 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
35 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
36 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
36 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
38 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
39 | XU Michael | 100% | 99% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | BUKOWSKI Todd | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
41 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | RUDNET Noah | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | XIAO Ethan | 100% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
44 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
45 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
46 | YIU Franklin | 100% | 90% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
47 | YURT Vehbi | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.