La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Shawn J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | OSTER Keegan J. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 3 | EMIR PUTRA Syed Adam | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 5 | GEORGE Evan C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 6 | DEANS Donovan | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | REESE Aaron S. | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 8 | LEONELLI Alexandre | D V V V V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | SOHN Kevin J. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | LIMB Matthew G. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | LAU Cheung Kang | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | PARK Justin W. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | CHOU Stephen C. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 15 | FLORES Gerardo (Gerardito) D. | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 16 | HU William | D V V V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | MISOGAS Matthew B. | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 18 | FOSADO Alejandro P. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 19 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 20 | LEE Kevin H. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 21 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | V V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 22 | CHU Sean L. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 23 | ZHOU Matthew R. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 24 | WINKLER Lucas G. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | LIANG Connor | V V D D D V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 26 | BLATCHLEY Thomas R. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 27 | SOHN Joshua C. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 28 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | V D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 29 | FLORES Peter D. | V D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 30 | TANG Alex Y. | V V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | KOUNALAKIS Evangelos T. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | D D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 33 | FALLICK Ozzie | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 34 | COPELAND Oliver E. | D D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 35 | KANG Brandon M. | D V V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 36 | CHEN Howard | D D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 37 | YANG Kevin S. | D V V D V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 38 | MARSEE James | D D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 39 | TRINH Trevor Z. | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 40 | DINU Nicholas D. | D V D V D D | D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
| 41 | RAY Alexander K. | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 43 | LI Joshua L. | D D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 44 | BALDAUF Frederick (Fritz) P. | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 45 | ELBERT Oliver D. | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 46 | CHANG Nigel | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 47 | SINGER Carson | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 48 | HICHA Paul R. | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 49 | KIM Benjamin H. | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 50 | ANFORA Andrew T. | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 50 | SGHERZI Vincent | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 52 | BURR Tanner B. | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 53 | SUORSA Markus | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 54 | ORPILLA Apolo A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 55 | MCLAY Robert | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 56 | KORINTH Alexander J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.