Arlington, TX - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BRATTON Jack S. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 52% | 21% |
| 2 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 3 | TAQUET William P. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | EUSCHER Alex M. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
| 5 | LONG Quinton R. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 6 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
| 7 | LEWIS Paul D. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 8 | DESHMUKH Ayush | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 9 | RUFFNER Blake W. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 10 | NEWELL Ian A. | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 11 | ZMIJEWSKI Filip | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
| 12 | PATINO Yahir | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | JAUME Andrei | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 14 | SHIBU Pranav | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | NEWHARD Noah A. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | POPOKH Leo | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | MURRAY Maximo | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 18 | STEPHENS Maximilian A. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | PAEZ Joshua | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
| 20 | THAYER Jake T. | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 21 | PIERCE Logan | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | FRANZNICK Charles (Charlie) W. | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SHOURDS Shalyn W. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 24 | QUINONES Diego A. | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | CHENG Nathan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | PRASANNA Advaith | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KIM BANSEOK | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | DIEP Daniel | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 29 | KUO Evan | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | YANG Andrew | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | BATANG Cergio Manuel A. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | WEEKS Richard P. | 3% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | FINLEY Dylan | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CONVERSE Warren D. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | GIVENS Thomas H. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 36 | MONTAGUE Dante | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GUO Zachary | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | BOLERJACK Berton J. | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | REYES Omar | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | GARCIA Dylan | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | WOODALL Ian L. | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.