San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | COLLINS Damase | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
2 | SIVAGAR Leo | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
3 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
3 | PALLI Maximillian | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
5 | DIECK Logan O. | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
6 | LIU Felix | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
7 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
8 | THOMPSON Chester | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
9 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
10 | KIM Benjamin I. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
11 | GARRETT Samuel | - | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
12 | MILEY NIck N. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
13 | KUO Elvin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
14 | LIU Andrew | 3% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 9% | - | |
15 | BAGCHI Aritra | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
16 | LAU Matthew | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
17 | WRIGHT Christopher | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 1% | |
18 | MALEEV Georgy | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% | |
19 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
20 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
21 | KATZ Matheo | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
22 | FINK August | 15% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
23 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
24 | LIANG derek | 48% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.