Arlington, TX - Arlington, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HURME Tommi K. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 2 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | WILEY Joseph (Scott) S. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | GYURE Brayden H. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | FRAY Alexander | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | KEHOE James E. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | MUGA Boris | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 8 | DAVIS Scott | V V D V V D | V V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 9 | PLAISANCE Louis | V V V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 10 | STONE Henry J. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | ORTEGA Josue I. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | ILIEV Velizar K. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 14 | THAYER Jake T. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 15 | SUVOROV Yuly | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 16 | JOHNSON Ben | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | MUNLIN Donovan | V V V V D V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | VENKAT Rakesh | V V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | LUEBBE Jost | V D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | GUIMIOT Henri | D D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | MALIASSOV Nikita S. | D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 23 | KARAUSKY Joshua C. | D V V V D D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 24 | FRANZNICK Charles (Charlie) W. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | BRUS Brian V. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | HANKINS Trace | V D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | ORTEGA Salvador | V D V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 28 | MAHMOUD Hossam | D V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 29 | GODDARD Hal D. | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | FUCHS Marshall J. | V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 31 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 32 | WHITE Douglas (Doug) W. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | DECKARD Blake B. | V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 34 | WELDON Benjamin | V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 35 | CONVERSE Warren D. | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 36 | COMER Alexander J. | D D D V V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 37 | PANAYOTOV Alexander | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 38 | CASTLEMAN Levi | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 39 | JAHANGIRI William J. | V D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 40 | KARKI Salyan | V D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 41 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | D D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 42 | STARR Michael | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 43 | SMITH Dylan | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 45 | BARGE Jackson | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 46 | RIBAUDO David J. | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 47 | HESSE Frederick Q. | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 48 | OLDHAM Zachary | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 49 | UNDERWOOD John D. | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | DOUGLAS Benjamin | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 51 | GRAY Connor W. | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 52 | ERTEL Mark C. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 53 | SONG Branden | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.