Star Cup RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men’s Saber (CDTMS)

Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Register

Fore Kicks Sports Complex - Taunton, MA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2908 3009 - 2843
5 - 8 2805 2827 - 2792
9 - 16 2685 2780 - 2560
17 - 32 2430 2544 - 2291
33 - 60 1865 2312 - 1181

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 SHIRPAL, Oleksandr Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 3009 2752.19
2 Kang, Evan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2902 2644.71
3 McCarthy, Gabriel Tim Morehouse Fencing Club C22 2878 2625.02
4 Peng, Bryan Boston Fencing Club D21 2843 2590.34
5 Lin, Maxim International Fencing Club E22 2827 2573.48
6 Chterental, Alex Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2803 2551.50
7 Kushkov, Daniel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. B22 2792 2537.79
8 TENG, MATTHEW Platinum Fencing Academy C22 2799 2513.97
9 Shahzad, Azlan Zeta Fencing C22 2780 2512.92
10 Morales, Jonathan International Fencing Club C22 2753 2497.60
11 Zhao, Lucas Platinum Fencing Academy U 2736 2481.51
12 Chung, Connor Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2725 2474.87
13 Wang, Daniel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2713 2461.80
14 Noureldin, Gabriel Sheridan Fencing Academy D21 2627 2372.28
15 Gong, Jerry International Fencing Club D22 2585 2336.03
16 Savoy, Luca Beaches Sabre Club - NY D22 2560 2300.26
17 Ngo, Maximus Unattached U 2525 2270.12
18 Huang, Connor Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2544 2269.28
19 Katz, Ryan Stamford Fencing Center, LLC U 2511 2261.09
20 Huang, Alexander Manhattan Fencing Center D21 2495 2238.19
21 Sugiura, Samuel Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2466 2217.80
22 Meyerson, Jacob Zeta Fencing U 2448 2189.03
23 Brandt, Jaden Stamford Fencing Center, LLC E22 2443 2186.60
24 Shipitsin, Alexander Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 2409 2153.29
25 Engel, Peter Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 2489 2145.92
26 Weber, Mattias Manhattan Fencing Center E22 2398 2134.63
27 Oh, Aster Scarsdale Fencing Center U 2379 2125.57
28 Lin, Philip Stamford Fencing Center, LLC U 2360 2109.59
29 Dumoulin, Gabriel Candlewood Fencing Center E22 2396 2102.43
30 Lau, Justin Stamford Fencing Center, LLC E22 2397 2089.17
31 Laub, William Zeta Fencing U 2329 2072.04
32 Tasikas, Stylianos Rochester Fencing Club U 2291 2005.39
33 Smink, Oliver Rochester Fencing Club E22 2312 2003.82
34 Eybelman, Ariel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2244 1982.09
35 Hurowitz, Max Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. D21 2252 1960.86
36 ZHENG, LEON Bergen Fencing Club E22 2187 1927.22
37 Boulais, Andrew Rochester Fencing Club U 2185 1899.28
38 Atwood, Griffin Zeta Fencing U 2153 1895.44
39 Kessler, Nathan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 2117 1801.74
40 Manescu, Miron Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 2050 1745.46
41 Wong, Caleb Excel Fencing Academy U 1997 1740.07
42 Ho, Jacob Rochester Fencing Club U 2005 1709.11
43 Leung, Ian Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2029 1693.89
44 Mungovan, Matthew International Fencing Club E21 1967 1668.98
45 Perron, Robert Boston Fencing Club E22 1955 1660.44
46 Simmons, John Fencing Academy Of Boston U 1972 1627.28
47 Kumar, Arjun Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 1837 1539.20
48 Almeda, Stanislav Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1887 1531.32
49 Xia, Eric Bergen Fencing Club E22 1906 1530.47
50 Tauer, Sam Zeta Fencing U 1837 1457.04
51 Deka, Tanush Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA E22 1773 1441.31
52 OLoughlin, Quin Rochester Fencing Club U 1702 1362.76
53 Sen, Christian Bergen Fencing Club U 1699 1314.76
54 Carroll, Charles Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1941 1276.49
55 Feng, Weiting (Ryan) Platinum Fencing Academy U 1845 1009.32
56 Margulian, Grant Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1225 437.30
57 Klauber, Raphael Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1411 385.38
58 Fisher, Paul Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1270 301.49
59 Chin, Nigel Boston Fencing Club U 1181 196.89
60 lei, Antoine U 1270 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!