Star Cup RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men’s Saber (CDTMS)

Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Register

Fore Kicks Sports Complex - Taunton, MA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2906 3013 - 2843
5 - 8 2794 2817 - 2772
9 - 16 2681 2754 - 2560
17 - 32 2422 2544 - 2266
33 - 60 1864 2312 - 1181

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 SHIRPAL, Oleksandr Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 3013 2756.41
2 Kang, Evan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2888 2630.42
3 McCarthy, Gabriel Tim Morehouse Fencing Club C22 2878 2625.02
4 Peng, Bryan Boston Fencing Club D21 2843 2590.34
5 Chterental, Alex Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2805 2554.88
6 TENG, MATTHEW Platinum Fencing Academy C22 2817 2531.52
7 Kushkov, Daniel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. B22 2772 2516.78
8 Shahzad, Azlan Zeta Fencing C22 2780 2512.92
9 Chung, Connor Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2753 2502.32
10 Lin, Maxim International Fencing Club E22 2754 2499.22
11 Morales, Jonathan International Fencing Club C22 2728 2471.91
12 Zhao, Lucas Platinum Fencing Academy U 2717 2462.57
13 Wang, Daniel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2708 2457.79
14 Noureldin, Gabriel Sheridan Fencing Academy D21 2627 2372.28
15 Gong, Jerry International Fencing Club D22 2600 2350.17
16 Savoy, Luca Beaches Sabre Club - NY D22 2560 2300.26
17 Huang, Connor Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2544 2269.28
18 Ngo, Maximus U 2515 2261.30
19 Huang, Alexander Manhattan Fencing Center D21 2495 2239.01
20 Katz, Ryan Stamford Fencing Center, LLC U 2484 2234.09
21 Sugiura, Samuel Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2466 2217.80
22 Brandt, Jaden Stamford Fencing Center, LLC E22 2443 2186.60
23 Shipitsin, Alexander Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 2415 2159.64
24 Engel, Peter Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 2489 2145.92
25 Meyerson, Jacob Zeta Fencing U 2404 2143.17
26 Oh, Aster Scarsdale Fencing Center U 2389 2136.43
27 Weber, Mattias Manhattan Fencing Center E22 2398 2134.63
28 Lin, Philip Stamford Fencing Center, LLC U 2357 2106.52
29 Dumoulin, Gabriel Candlewood Fencing Center E22 2396 2102.43
30 Lau, Justin Stamford Fencing Center, LLC E22 2397 2089.17
31 Laub, William Zeta Fencing U 2266 2008.92
32 Tasikas, Stylianos Rochester Fencing Club U 2291 2005.39
33 Smink, Oliver Rochester Fencing Club E22 2312 2003.82
34 Eybelman, Ariel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C22 2228 1964.43
35 Hurowitz, Max Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. D21 2252 1960.86
36 ZHENG, LEON Bergen Fencing Club E22 2199 1937.11
37 Atwood, Griffin Zeta Fencing U 2169 1910.95
38 Boulais, Andrew Rochester Fencing Club U 2189 1903.48
39 Kessler, Nathan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 2117 1801.74
40 Manescu, Miron Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 2054 1748.92
41 Ho, Jacob Rochester Fencing Club U 2005 1709.11
42 Leung, Ian Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2029 1693.89
43 Wong, Caleb Excel Fencing Academy U 1949 1689.06
44 Mungovan, Matthew International Fencing Club E21 1967 1668.98
45 Perron, Robert Boston Fencing Club E22 1955 1660.44
46 Simmons, John Fencing Academy Of Boston U 1972 1627.28
47 Kumar, Arjun Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E22 1837 1539.20
48 Almeda, Stanislav Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1887 1531.32
49 Xia, Eric Bergen Fencing Club E22 1906 1530.47
50 Tauer, Sam Zeta Fencing U 1837 1457.04
51 Deka, Tanush Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA E22 1773 1441.31
52 OLoughlin, Quin Rochester Fencing Club U 1702 1362.76
53 Sen, Christian Bergen Fencing Club U 1699 1314.76
54 Carroll, Charles Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1941 1276.49
55 Feng, Weiting (Ryan) Platinum Fencing Academy U 1845 1009.32
56 Margulian, Grant Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1225 437.30
57 Klauber, Raphael Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1411 385.38
58 Fisher, Paul Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1270 301.49
59 Chin, Nigel Boston Fencing Club U 1181 196.89
60 lei, Antoine U 1270 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!