Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | XU Andy P. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
2 | MARX Jackson L. | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
3 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
3 | GULCHIN Mark | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
5 | BOBROW Silas | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
6 | SHIM Peter S. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | MARTIN Darius | D V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
8 | LEE Brendan | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | WONG Jacob W. | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
10 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
11 | LI Allen | V V V V D V | V D | 1.4 | 5 | +3.6 |
12 | SIMONOV Timofey | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | GHEDINI Luca | D D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
14 | MO Ethan | V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
15 | PARK Maxwell | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
16 | KIAYIAS Aris | D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
17 | KOKES William | V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
18 | ZENG Rick | D V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
19 | GEOGHEGAN Logan | V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
20 | TANG Royce | V V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
21 | TOOMRE Luca | V D D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
22 | TANG Terry | D V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
23 | CHA James | V V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
24 | SICAT Justin | D V V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
25 | TOOMRE Kai | V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
26 | MARTIRE Luca | D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
27 | FOGELSON Hugh | D V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
28 | ONIK Ari N. | D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
29 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
30 | CHO Xzander | D D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
31 | ZHANG Lucas | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
32 | HONG Logan | D D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
33 | NORMILE Nicholas | D D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
34 | DONG Joshua | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
35 | YAO Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
36 | SANDOW Sterling | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
37 | SHAW eric | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
38 | XIA Philip | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
39 | ZHAO Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.