Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 17% | |
| 2 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 3 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% |
| 3 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 37% | |
| 5 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 6 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 7 | DUCKETT Myles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 8 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | |
| 9 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 10 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 11 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 12 | CHENG Cody | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 2% |
| 13 | SAHAY Kenji | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | ALLARDYCE Graham | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
| 17 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 20% |
| 18 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% | |
| 19 | ALLARDYCE Lachlan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% | 1% | |
| 20 | CHIU Vincent | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | LEMPERT Adam | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | STURN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 26 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 9% | |
| 27 | VORONOVICH Aleksei | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | YAO Kevin | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 34% | |
| 30 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | RIVERA Ilan Federico | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | KWALWASSER Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 33 | YANG Kevin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | SINGER Marcus | 100% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
| 38 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | PENG Victor | 100% | 84% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | NG Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | SANTOS Theodore | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SEN Christian | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 93% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | MANGAN Daniel Marsh | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | FTAIHA Ezra | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | HE Bowen | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 50 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 51 | RUSSELL Hudson | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | VOLVOVSKIY Tim | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 53 | MATTSON Logan | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | SHAH Sajan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 81% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 56 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 58 | LIN Maxwell | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.