San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 4% |
| 2 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 3 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% |
| 5 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 6 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
| 7 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% |
| 8 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 9 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 2% |
| 10 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 52% |
| 11 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | CHUNG Jaein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 13 | YIN Helen | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 14 | CUI Melody J. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 16 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 6% |
| 17 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 18 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% |
| 19 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 20 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | GONG Chloe | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LI Angela | 100% | 85% | 37% | 6% | - | - |
| 23 | SU Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 24 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 25 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 28 | JI Raissa | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 30 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 37% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | PISHARODI Smriti | 100% | 39% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | MITLOFF Allison | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | NARBERES Emily R. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | DHILLON Ria | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 35 | GREEN Perri L. | 100% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | ANTEBI Sarah | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DERMETZIS Adriana | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 37 | WU Sarah | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DHILLON Amani | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 40 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 95% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 40 | WANG Maya | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.