Edison, NJ - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 2 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 3 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 3 | BROWN Emma | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 9% |
| 5 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 6 | TAO Hannah J. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% | |
| 7 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 6% |
| 8 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 25% |
| 9 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 11 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 12 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 13 | DUCKETT Madison | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | NEIBART Fiona | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 15 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 16 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 17 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 18 | BOIS Adele | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 19 | PRIEUR Lauren | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 20 | XIKES Katherine E. | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 21 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | - | 7% | 38% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 24 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 3% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 25 | DAI Olivia | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 26 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 27 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
| 28 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | LIGH Erenei J. | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | KRYLOVA Valery | 2% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | JIN Olivia P. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | CHARLES Caitlin | 49% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | LIGH Karis | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | JAVERI Amaya | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | NAYAK Esha | 33% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CUEVAS-LO My Ting | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | NAYAK Anika | 27% | 46% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.