San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
2 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% |
3 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
3 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% | |
5 | SU Alena J. | - | - | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
6 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
7 | UMAP Arna | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
8 | CHUNG Jaein | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
9 | MITLOFF Allison | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
10 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
11 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
12 | KOSLOW Amicie | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
13 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
14 | TSANG Catherine | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
15 | WELBORN Calissa | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
16 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
17 | FUNG Emma | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
18 | HOBSON Ava | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
19 | LIN Katherine Y. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
20 | GONG Chloe | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
21 | LEE Samantha X. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
22 | WANG Celine S. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
23 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
25 | BACCARI Isabella M. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
26 | DHILLON Amani | 8% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
27 | DAYAL Saahira | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
28 | LUO Sandra J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
29 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 7% | |
30 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
31 | XU Audrey J. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
33 | MANN Sophia J. | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
34 | CONTOS Athena | 21% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
35 | DUONG Zoey | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | FUNG Vera | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | NICKOLOV Nora | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
38 | HO Kristen | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | BOLES Amanda X. | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
41 | KIM Rachel | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | CHANG Natalie | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
44 | VO Bao-Vy | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
45 | LAU Kailey Z. | 7% | 32% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | |
46 | ZHENG Zoe | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
47 | THOMAS Saejel | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
50 | ENRILE Erica | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.