Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 2 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
| 3 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 6% |
| 5 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
| 6 | ROY Layla | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
| 7 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | FU Qihan | - | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 9 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 28% |
| 10 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
| 11 | TOBIN Brean | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | XIANG Emma | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 13 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 14 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | - | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | FELLUS Talia E. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | LIU Sophia | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 17 | SU Michelle | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 18 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 27% | |
| 19 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 6% |
| 20 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 2% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 21 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 11% | 50% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 22 | CHEN Jasmine | 2% | 23% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | NULAND Zoe | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | SHAH Aanya | 43% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | ZHENG Julie | - | 5% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 26 | HOU Wendong | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 39% | 12% | |
| 28 | SHMAY Anastasia | 1% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | CHEN Thea | 27% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | JIANG Claire | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 32 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 1% | 10% | 45% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 34 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | ZHOU Sophia | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | WANG Rachael | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LEE Kaitlyn | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BENNETT Abigail | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 40 | DALBERG Meadow | 53% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Miley | 29% | 60% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | COHEN-RAYMOND Beatrix | 29% | 51% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CHAGARES Isabella | 52% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | KEM Madeleine | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | UNGERER Frieda | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | JIN Wendy | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.