Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
2 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% | |
3 | KATZ Anat | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
3 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
5 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | |
6 | LIN Angela | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
7 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
8 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
9 | CANNON Sophia E. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
10 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
11 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
12 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
13 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
14 | HILD Nisha | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
15 | KOO Samantha | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
16 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
17 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 7% | |
17 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 33% | |
19 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
20 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
21 | TIBURCIO Diana | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
22 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
23 | YURT Leyla | - | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
24 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 13% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
25 | SINHA Anika | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
26 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
27 | YUAN Greta | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
29 | SU Emma | 1% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
30 | NAYAK Mira | 43% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
32 | LIGH Karis | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | NAYAK Indra | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
34 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
35 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | 28% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
37 | YU Melinda | 2% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
38 | WANG Jianning | 4% | 37% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
39 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
40 | SHIH Christina | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
40 | BILLETER Mary | 31% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
40 | CHARLES Caitlin | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
43 | DONG Zihan | 44% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | JENKINS Scotland | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.