Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 2 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 9% |
| 3 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 3 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 5 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 13% | |
| 6 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 16% | |
| 7 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 8 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 9 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
| 10 | HONG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 11 | TOOMRE Luca | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 12 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 13 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 14 | LI Allen | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 17 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
| 20 | CHA James | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 21 | PHAM Kian | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | PEARL Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 25 | SHAW eric | 100% | 65% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 26 | WANG Ralph | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 27 | WU Andrew Y. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | YAO Ethan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | COVELL Saunder | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | LU Hansen | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LI Johnson | 100% | 68% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | UNGERER Henry | 100% | 76% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.