Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
2 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | - | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
3 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 29% |
3 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% |
5 | CLARK Aram | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% |
6 | FADEL Alexander | - | - | 6% | 35% | 44% | 15% |
7 | URSU Marcel T. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
8 | LEE Andrew | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
9 | ALAVE Kyle | - | - | 1% | 19% | 47% | 33% |
10 | SANTOS Theodore | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
11 | WAXLER Ryan | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
12 | PORTER Dupree | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
13 | LEUNG Ian | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
14 | WANG Daniel | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
15 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 12% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
16 | KIM Ethan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
17 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | - | - | 6% | 32% | 45% | 17% |
18 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
19 | JUNG Ethan | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
20 | GONZALEZ Kal-El | 23% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
21 | YOOK Isaac | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
22 | PRAJAPATI Devin D. | 11% | 41% | 41% | 7% | - | - |
23 | VINAS Avery Tai | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
24 | LORENZ Evan | 5% | 36% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
25 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | SCIMONE Colin | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
27 | WILLIAMS Corey | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | LOO Jason | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
29 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 31% | 47% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
30 | ZHU Theodore | 66% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.