Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
2 | DENG Andrew | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
3 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
3 | WONG Ryan | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
5 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
6 | SHTEYN Mark | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
7 | KASPER Aaron | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
8 | MARGULIES William | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
9 | FLOT Tai A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
10 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
11 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
12 | HO Kaden M. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
13 | OH Triton | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
14 | SANDERS Samuel B. | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
15 | MOULTON Ian | 5% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
16 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | |
17 | WEBER Mattias A. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 3% |
18 | WANG Charles | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
19 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
20 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
21 | WAXLER Seth B. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
22 | BERMAN Luca | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% |
23 | NG Jeremiah | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
24 | WANG Robert | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 22% |
25 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
26 | BREKHMAN Eric | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
27 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
28 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
29 | HAN Daniel Y. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
30 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
31 | SAVOY Luca | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
32 | CHAN Austin | 2% | 17% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
34 | ZHANG Yankun | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
36 | GIZERSKY Jared | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
37 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
38 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
39 | HUANG Tom | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
40 | LEONARD Charles | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | SHTEIN Yan | - | 3% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
42 | CHTERENTAL Alex | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
43 | ZHU Shao | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
44 | PENG Bryan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
45 | RODE Leon J. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
46 | ALTIRS Giorgio | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
47 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
48 | CHO Winston | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
49 | SANDHU Arjan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
50 | WU Hunter | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
51 | KESSLER Josh | 6% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
52 | WU Wilmund | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
53 | CAMPO Alexander P. | 10% | 60% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
54 | CHUANG Tristan | - | 3% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
55 | LAU Justin Y. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
56 | PERRON Robert | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
56 | YURT Vehbi | 25% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
58 | KOGAN Nikita | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
59 | TANG Charles | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
60 | DEPEW Spencer | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | |
61 | SEN David | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
62 | HUROWITZ Max | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
63 | SUGIURA Samuel | 9% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | GOLD Carter | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
65 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
66 | KNUDSEN Matthew S. | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
66 | TIAGI Daniel | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
68 | FREDRICK Jameer | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
69 | PILAT Matthew J. | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
70 | TIAGI George | 42% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
71 | DAI William | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
72 | STOLPER Max | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
73 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
74 | CHO Blake | 3% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | |
75 | POSY Daniel | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
76 | NAYAK Surin K. | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | CHENG Hong | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
78 | KESSLER Nathan | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 3% | - |
79 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | DONALDSON Christopher | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.