Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
2 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 13% |
3 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
5 | SU Emma | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
6 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% |
7 | CANNON Sophia E. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
8 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
9 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% | |
10 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
11 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
12 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 31% | |
13 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 9% |
14 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
15 | WANG Jianning | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
17 | KATZ Anat | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
18 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
19 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
20 | SHIH Christina | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
21 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
22 | YUAN Greta | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
23 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
24 | LIN Angela | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
25 | KOO Samantha | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
26 | JENKINS Scotland | 7% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
27 | JACOBS Skye | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
28 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
29 | ILYIN Anna | 3% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 4% | - | |
30 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 9% | 41% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
31 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | NAYAK Indra | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | HE Xi | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
34 | CRUZ Sonia | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
35 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | SAHNI Sophia | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | NGUYEN Ella | 7% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
39 | DONG Zihan | 15% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
40 | JOHNSTON Lily | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
41 | NAYAK Anika | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
42 | NAYAK Mira | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
43 | LIU Grace | 29% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | CHARLES Caitlin | 35% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | WHEELER Kira | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
46 | HORMEL Molly | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
47 | OPPY Mia | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
48 | MENDOZA Mariah | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.