The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | FEDKIW Olivier | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
2 | TAN Darren | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
3 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
3 | BAILEY Nate | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
5 | STONE Esmond A. | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 12% | |
6 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
7 | GOLDBERG Anton V. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
8 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 8% | 36% | 40% | 15% | 1% | |
9 | CARR Lucas | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
10 | FENECH Jean A. | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
11 | STONE Brad | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
12 | KIM Ryan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
13 | WU Lanting | 1% | 9% | 36% | 45% | 10% | |
14 | KUIRY Shounak | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
15 | BINGHAM Andrew | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
16 | EVANS Madelynn | 11% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.