The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BREWER Andrew K. | V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 2 | HEDGES Philip | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SMAY II Joseph E. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 3 | CAI Kevin P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | HELGE James | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | BECK Brian C. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 7 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | D V V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 8 | JAIN Sarthak | V V D V D | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 9 | NOLL Mischa (michael) | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 10 | ALLGEIER Peter | V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | MILLER Kevin W. | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | MARIANI Lou | V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 13 | NORTON Brendan E. | D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 14 | TARBUSKOVICH John | V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | ERIKSEN Odin F. | V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | LOUIE Jason | D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 17 | WONG Kevin | V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 18 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | D D V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 19 | LEE Kaitlyn | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 20 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 21 | DYER Carson | D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 22 | JOSEPH Abey | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 23 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 24 | MADRID Maureen | D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | OHSHIMA Saiyou | V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | ELANGO SriVaaikuntesh | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 27 | HOFMAN Haejung | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 28 | DYER C.J. | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 29 | LOUIE Sarah | D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | AHMED Saheer | D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | WILLEY Audrey | D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | GAUR Ishi | D D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 33 | ANGADALA Leela Krishna | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 34 | COCKRELL Quintin | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 35 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 36 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.