San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
2 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 9% | |
3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
3 | KER Grace | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
5 | BURCH Keona Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
6 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | - |
7 | KONG Carys H. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
8 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
9 | GOMES Diana C. | 2% | 26% | 49% | 20% | 3% | < 1% | |
10 | YAM Danika | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 39% | 8% |
11 | YANG Angelina | - | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | |
12 | KRASTEV Minna | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
13 | FLETCHER Belen | 1% | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
14 | TSE Angelina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
15 | NG Sarah W. | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
16 | WANG Zidan | 38% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
17 | LIU Sydney | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 40% | 12% | |
18 | PYO Penelope E. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 5% | - |
19 | TREACY Aisling | 19% | 52% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
20 | JAVERI Amaya | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
21 | JUNG Irene | 15% | 48% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
22 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | TSOI Julie | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
24 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
25 | KIM Caitlin | 61% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
26 | DIECK Miranda P. | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.