National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
2 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
3 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | |
5 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
6 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
7 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
8 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
9 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
10 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
11 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
12 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
13 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
14 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
15 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
16 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
17 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
18 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
19 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
20 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% | 2% |
21 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
22 | FAN Grace | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
23 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
24 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
25 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
26 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
27 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
28 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
29 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% | |
30 | XU ALINA | 100% | 81% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
31 | DAI TONGXI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
32 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
33 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
34 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 52% | 10% |
35 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
36 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
37 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 6% |
37 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
39 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
40 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
41 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
42 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
43 | PENG Florella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% | 3% |
44 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
45 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
46 | DAVIS Jordan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 36% | 6% | - |
47 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
48 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
49 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
50 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
51 | ZENG Megan | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
52 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
53 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
54 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
55 | SAHNI Sophia | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
56 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
57 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
57 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
59 | CRUZ Sonia | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
60 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
61 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
62 | WU Yuwei | 100% | 87% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
63 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
64 | STRAYER Sofia I. | 100% | 46% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
65 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 100% | 70% | 25% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
66 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | |
67 | CRISAFULLI Alessia | 100% | 89% | 47% | 5% | - | - | - |
68 | MU Vicki Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
69 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
70 | ILYIN Anna | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
71 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
72 | HALL Gianna | 100% | 71% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
73 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
74 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
75 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
76 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
78 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 82% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
79 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
80 | SHPILSKY Maya | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
81 | DUBE Naomi | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
82 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
83 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
84 | ZHAO Emily W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
84 | WUNNAVA Elina | 100% | 82% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
86 | FEO ZAKHAROVA Isabella | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
87 | XIAO julie | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
88 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 77% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
89 | BRIATORE Francesca | 100% | 80% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
90 | DANTULURI Shivani | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
91 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
92 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
93 | COLBY Mercer | 100% | 54% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
94 | COLLINS Margaret L. | 100% | 63% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
95 | HONG Hannah | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
96 | WU Selina | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.