National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 2 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 3 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 49% | |
| 5 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 6 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 32% | |
| 7 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 8 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | ROY Layla | - | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 10 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
| 11 | MATOS Lívia | - | - | 8% | 39% | 52% | ||
| 12 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 13 | DAVIES Ellie | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 15 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% | |
| 16 | SONG Yuqiao A. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 17 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
| 18 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 19 | LIN Zhi tong | - | 2% | 17% | 51% | 31% | ||
| 20 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 11% | |
| 22 | LEE Lavender | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 24% | ||
| 22 | SUN Chloe | 1% | 8% | 37% | 43% | 11% | ||
| 24 | WANG Jasmine | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 2% |
| 25 | YURKOVA Mariia | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 26 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 1% | 12% | 47% | 40% | |
| 28 | YAO Ada | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 4% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | |
| 30 | YANG Iris | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 33% | 6% | |
| 31 | MONTERO Fernanda | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 32 | HONG Elizabeth R. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | LI Sophia M. | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 40% | 10% | |
| 34 | BURBERRY Livia | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | MI Aileen | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | HOANG Mai | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 37 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
| 38 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 40 | SHIM Grace | 3% | 23% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | DEVLIN Xeta | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 43 | KIDWELL Victoria | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 36% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | ||
| 45 | ZHOU Sophia | 10% | 36% | 40% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | NEWSON Grace | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 47 | PEVZNER Nicole | 13% | 48% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 48 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 49 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 50 | SHENG Chuxi | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | BROWN Lily | 37% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SMITH Meghan | 8% | 45% | 36% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 53 | PARK Lina | 1% | 14% | 43% | 35% | 7% | ||
| 53 | MEI Sarah | 28% | 50% | 19% | 2% | - | ||
| 55 | NULAND Zoe | 41% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | ||
| 56 | PAULUS Sloane | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | CHAGARES Isabella | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | ROSENBERG Danielle | 30% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 59 | CALISE Ella | 1% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 60 | HOANG Anh | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 61 | PAULUS Isabella | 1% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Ania | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 64 | WANG Sophia | < 1% | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 65 | DARPINO Chloe | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 66 | ZHANG Ivy | 54% | 38% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 67 | ZHANG Alina | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | STACK Katie | 45% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | GAO Anne | 34% | 49% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | JONES Emily | 8% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% | ||
| 71 | JIANG Yunyu (Grace) | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | RHEE-ALBRECHT Kaya | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | EVELAND Zoe | 19% | 52% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 74 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | CARAMELO Audrey T. | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.