Capitol Clash SYC, RCC, Veteran ROC & Y8

Cadet Women's Saber

Monday, January 20, 2020 at 1:00 PM

National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
2 BLUM Leah I. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
3 SATHYANATH Kailing 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 18%
3 LU Elaine 100% 100% 96% 73% 27% 3%
5 ANDRES Katherine A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 35%
6 CANNON Sophia E. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
7 HILD Nisha 100% 100% 98% 80% 38% 6%
8 DELSOIN Chelsea C. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 20%
9 OLSEN Natalie J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 21%
10 SHOMAN Jenna 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 52%
11 CHEN Xiaohan 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 45% 9%
12 CARVALHO Isabela A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 50%
13 TANG Annie L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 34%
14 NEWELL Alexia C. 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 17%
15 CHANG Emily 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 29% 5%
16 JOHNSON Lauren 100% 100% 100% 95% 66% 17%
17 VADASZ Ibla P. 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 9%
18 GORMAN Victoria M. 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
19 SOURIMTO Valeria 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 17%
20 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 9%
21 HASSANEIN Toqa 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 3%
22 NYSTROM Sofia C. 100% 100% 93% 68% 27% 3%
23 TAO Hannah J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 37%
24 SHI Cathleen 100% 99% 89% 59% 21% 3%
25 WIGGERS Susan Q. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 37%
26 KOO Samantha 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 42% 10%
27 KER Grace 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 33% 7%
28 MIKA Veronica 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 32%
29 DUCKETT Madison 100% 100% 99% 86% 47% 9%
30 PRIEUR Lauren 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 51% 11%
31 LIAO Siwen 100% 98% 86% 54% 21% 4% -
32 ANTHONY Alexia B. 100% 99% 92% 65% 27% 5%
33 NG Sarah W. 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 3% -
34 ROMAGNOLI Isabella 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 7%
35 YANG Ashley M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 22%
36 LUKASHENKO Angelina 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
37 DHAR Aamina 100% 99% 92% 58% 18% 2%
38 BENTOLILA Thalia 100% 100% 92% 60% 23% 4% -
39 WEI Vivian W. 100% 100% 99% 89% 56% 17% 2%
40 BEVACQUA Aria F. 100% 100% 94% 69% 31% 7% 1%
41 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 11%
42 IQBAL Sulphia 100% 94% 66% 26% 5% -
43 SHOMAN Miriam 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 2%
44 HOVERMAN Hannah A. 100% 100% 99% 87% 51% 14% 1%
45 YUAN Greta 100% 99% 90% 61% 26% 6% -
46 CHEN Ashley 100% 100% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
47 OBRADOVIC Ana 100% 99% 92% 66% 31% 8% 1%
48 ILYIN Anna 100% 97% 76% 31% 6% - -
49 TODD Phoebe 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 12% 1%
50 CHIANG Emily 100% 100% 96% 71% 29% 4%
51 JAVERI Amaya 100% 85% 45% 11% 1% -
52 GRINBERG Aliya 100% 98% 80% 43% 12% 1%
53 LARIMER Katherine E. 100% 100% 96% 78% 38% 6%
54 CHEN Xinyan 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 2%
55 NAYAK Indra 100% 98% 85% 53% 18% 3% -
56 DILLE Carolina G. 100% 89% 49% 14% 2% - -
57 LIGH Erenei J. 100% 100% 93% 70% 35% 10% 1%
58 CRUZ Sonia 100% 72% 24% 4% - - -
59 MU Vicki Y. 100% 98% 81% 48% 17% 3% -
60 OGANEZOVA Valerie 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% -
61 MA Grace C. 100% 91% 57% 19% 3% -
62 ZHAO Emily W. 100% 86% 42% 11% 1% -
63 RODRIGUEZ Colette O. 100% 85% 36% 8% 1% - -
64 NAYAK Mira 100% 82% 42% 11% 1% - -
65 WANG Jianning 100% 98% 81% 37% 7% -
66 JENKINS Scotland 100% 84% 43% 12% 2% - -
67 PENG Florella 100% 99% 91% 59% 22% 4% -
68 GREENHALGH Abigail 100% 42% 7% 1% - -
69 D'ORAZIO Sofia V. 100% 81% 34% 5% - -
70 BHOGAL Sukhleen 100% 39% 6% - - -
71 SAHNI Sophia 100% 53% 13% 2% - -
72 ZENG Megan 100% 51% 12% 1% - - -
73 MESSICK Maya 100% 82% 33% 6% - - -
74 MENDOZA Mariah 100% 99% 92% 65% 24% 2% -
75 HSU Mia Y. 100% 76% 34% 8% 1% - -
76 CHARLES Caitlin 100% 51% 11% 1% - - -
77 COHEN Charlotte 100% 66% 23% 4% - - -
78 HE Xi 100% 62% 19% 3% - -
79 ELDER Rhiannon C. 100% 37% 4% - - - -
80 KERBEL Natalie 100% 87% 33% 5% - -
81 CHO Madeleine K. 100% 86% 24% 3% - -
81 CALISTRI Ava 100% 85% 46% 13% 1% -
83 BOWDEN Ms Hope A. 100% 41% 8% 1% - - -
84 MEYTIN Sophia E. 100% 85% 45% 13% 2% - -
85 ILYIN Polina 100% 47% 11% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.