Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
2 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
3 | CLARK Aram | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
3 | LIU Kevin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
5 | URSU Marcel T. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 36% | 7% |
6 | ALAVE Kyle | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
7 | LIU Ryan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
8 | SHICK Cedric | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
9 | MORGAN Abrahm H. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
10 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - |
11 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
12 | RUSSELL Hudson | - | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
13 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
14 | MCDONALD Finn | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
15 | VOLODARSKY Daniel | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
16 | SHICK Baron | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
17 | KULAKSIZ Ali | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
18 | PORTER Dupree | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | YIP Ethan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
20 | KIM Ethan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
21 | SAYAR Luke | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
22 | TIAN Roger | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
23 | LIN Maxwell | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
23 | ZHANG Ray | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
25 | SHAH Kabir | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
26 | GAO Kai | 57% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | LOO Jason | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
28 | CHUNG Loden | 3% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.