Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
2 | MI Aileen | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
3 | LEVY Avery | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 3% | |
3 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
5 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% | |
6 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
7 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
8 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
9 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
10 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% |
11 | CALISE Ella | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
12 | SHIM Grace | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
13 | PEVZNER Nicole | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
14 | CHEN Renee | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
15 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
16 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
17 | YANG Iris | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% | |
18 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
19 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 5% | |
20 | WANG Jolie Z. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | CHAGARES Isabella | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
22 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
23 | NULAND Zoe | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
24 | MCSHERRY Emma | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
25 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
26 | LIAW Elaine | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 4% | |
27 | PARK Alexandria | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | WEI Angela | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | TANG Sophia | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
30 | WANG Reese | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
31 | DEVLIN Xeta | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
32 | WANG Sunny | 3% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | BADLANI Diya | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | BERGEL Daphne | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
35 | WALOR Riley H. | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
36 | CHOW Tessa | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% | |
37 | FORNES Jolie A. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
38 | SHKLYAR Antonina | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
39 | SCHULTZ Norah | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
40 | STACK Katie | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
41 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
42 | YU Jane | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
43 | BECKER Luz | 15% | 51% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
44 | BAIK Madeline | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
45 | KEM Madeleine | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | CHENG Audrey | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.