San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 2 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
| 3 | LABRACHE Ella P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 3 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 5 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 6 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% |
| 7 | LO Sabrina S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 3% |
| 9 | QURESHI Nisa | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 10 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 21% | 2% |
| 11 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 12 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 9% |
| 14 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 15 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 97% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 16 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% |
| 17 | QUIN Kathleen J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | RUSSELL Alison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 13% | - |
| 19 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 20 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 18% | 1% |
| 22 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 23 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 26 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 27 | ODOM Megan A. | 100% | 89% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KAUSHISH Sara | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BURCHETT Victoria | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | SOFAER-MORSE Xylia | 100% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 32 | MORA Lia Alessandra | 100% | 81% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 100% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | LAM Amelia Paige | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 35 | ANDERSON Melody | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | PARK Kathryn | 100% | 90% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.