Austin, TX - Austin, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
2 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
3 | LARIMER Katherine E. | - | - | 8% | 54% | 38% | |
3 | JEAN Olympe G. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
5 | PIOVANETTI Diana | 6% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
6 | XI Shining | - | - | 3% | 45% | 52% | |
7 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 25% | |
8 | AVRAMOVA Eliza | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
9 | DY Isabella | 13% | 44% | 39% | 4% | - | |
10 | HUNG Anna | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
11 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
12 | MORAN Rhea | 4% | 30% | 44% | 19% | 3% | |
13 | LEE Evelyn | 44% | 44% | 12% | - | - | |
14 | RODGERS Rachel | 17% | 50% | 30% | 2% | - | |
15 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
16 | DAVIS Charlotte | 42% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.