Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | VIVEROS Evan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
2 | RUDOLPH Max B. | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
3 | MALLOY Patrick G. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | LIM Samuel | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
5 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
6 | WILLIAMS-HOWE Sydney | V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
7 | ANDERSON Sidney E. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
8 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | V D V V V | V | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
9 | EDWARDS Darby | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
10 | CASPER Emily | V D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
11 | BURNS Andrew | V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
12 | NOVIKOV Sienna | D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
13 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
15 | KILLOUGH Klayton | D V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
16 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | D D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
17 | THORNTON Zachary | V V V D V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
18 | MCGUIRE gavin | V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
20 | BOHDAN Samuel | V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
21 | USELTON Kaden | V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
22 | HOWARD-BARR Zoe | V V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
23 | JOHNSON Nicholas | D V V V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
25 | WATKINS Christopher M. | D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
26 | VIVEROS Antonio | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
27 | CUNNINGHAM Jr. John P. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
28 | OLIVER Rachel | V D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
29 | MCARTHUR Kemp | D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
30 | LIOTTA Madison | D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
31 | MORROW Hope | D D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
32 | YOO Kristie | D D D D V D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
33 | LINDSEY Duncan | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
34 | JONES Malachi | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
35 | DELEMAR Joshua | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
36 | ANDRESS Joseph | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
37 | MATSUNAGA Alysa | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
38 | SOLEYMANI Jennifer | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
38 | MINSHEW Dustin | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
40 | WONG Gabriella | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.