Tennessee Recreation Center for Students - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 2 | KELLNER Taylor T. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 48% | 22% | |
| 3 | LE TAN | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 38% | |
| 3 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 5 | PATTERSON Michael | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 6 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 7 | GRAHAM Ian | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 8 | BUCHANAN Tanner | 3% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 9 | CROWLEY James | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% | |
| 10 | RICHERSON James | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 32% | 3% | |
| 11 | PATTERSON Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 2% |
| 12 | DAVENPORT Gage | 24% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 13 | WANG Andy | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | COLLIER Parker | 3% | 23% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | GENTRY Karsen P. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | LANE Brent | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 17 | CREVELING Kathryn | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | PRICE Walter | 23% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 19 | LIOTTA Madison | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.