Beaverton, OR - Beaverton, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 2 | DING Abigail | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | FERNANDES Thea | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 3 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% | |
| 5 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 6 | PALMER Meredith K. | - | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 7 | CUI Amy | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 18% |
| 8 | YEN Natalie | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
| 10 | KALE Anika A. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 11 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 12 | HWANG Jungmin | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | |
| 13 | HSIUNG Samantha | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | PANT Anisha | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 15 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
| 16 | LAMBERT Mahala | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 17 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 19 | LUO Sandra J. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | UMAP Arna | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | XUE Ellie | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 22 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 23 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 24 | HONG Elizabeth R. | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | HAN Crystal | - | - | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% |
| 26 | HAN Ashley | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | SULLIVAN Emma | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | HOBSON Ava | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 29 | LEE Samantha X. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | NAIR Supriya | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | BEAVER Hannah | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 35 | CHEN Teresa Y.Z. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 37 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | TSANG Catherine | 6% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | CHEN Ella | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | CHEN Chloe I. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 41 | XU Audrey J. | 9% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Selena | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Zoe | 11% | 45% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | TAYLOR Gabrielle | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | THOMAS Saejel | 9% | 43% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | LUH Mia P. | 8% | 40% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | SANDAU Ella | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | STRUGAR Steliana | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | QUINN Anna | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | NIRGUDE Siddhi | 55% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | KANG Ashley | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.