Beaverton, OR - Beaverton, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% | |
| 2 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% | |
| 3 | YANG Duncan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 3 | NYANTEE-ZEIGER Koan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 5 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 6 | GUZZO Vito | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 7 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 24% | |
| 8 | PI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 9 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 24% | 2% | |
| 9 | LUO George F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | |
| 11 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 12 | XU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 13 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 14 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | |
| 15 | YUN Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 16 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 18% | |
| 17 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 99% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 20 | KAKEHI Nicholas B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 12% |
| 21 | ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% |
| 23 | YAN Leonard Z. | 100% | 80% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 24 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 100% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 2% | |
| 25 | ALLEN Roland | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 26 | DANYO David | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | LEWALLEN Reece | 100% | 99% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 29 | JORGESON Charlie | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 30 | SHERES Asher | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | KIM Daniel Y | 100% | 62% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 96% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | FILER Joshua | 100% | 38% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | ROBLEDO Everett M. | 100% | 96% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | OSENAR Sam | 100% | 97% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | LUHAN Zachary | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 37 | CARL Ryan | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | DECK James Henry | 100% | 90% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.