Beaverton, OR - Beaverton, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
2 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
3 | NAIR Supriya | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
3 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
5 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
6 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
7 | STRUGAR Steliana | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
8 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
9 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
10 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
11 | LEE Allison | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
12 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
13 | HOBSON Ava | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
14 | YAN Noelle | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
15 | RAO Sonia D. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
16 | TSANG Catherine | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
17 | HONG Elizabeth R. | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
18 | VO Bao-Vy | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
19 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
20 | CHEN Ella | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% | |
21 | HAN Ashley | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
22 | HAN Crystal | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
23 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
24 | XUE Ellie | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
25 | LIU Emma | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
26 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
27 | ZHANG Selena | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
28 | CHU Camille | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
29 | CHEN Chloe I. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
30 | PENG Charlotte | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
31 | BEAVER Ava | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
32 | XU Audrey J. | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
33 | KIM Rachel | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
35 | ZHENG Zoe | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
36 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
37 | PENG Serena | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
38 | LUH Mia P. | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
39 | CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
40 | PIERSON Sophie | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
41 | CHUNG Penelope | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
42 | THOMAS Saejel | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | MAENG Victoria | 37% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.