Brentwood High School - Brentwood, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PAK Sean | V V | V V V V | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LEHR William D. | V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | MAAS Sean H. | V V D D V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 3 | REYES Vincent | V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 5 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | V V V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 6 | +3.3 |
| 6 | YE Leo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | FISHER Max Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | TUMMINELLO giuseppe | D D V V | V V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 9 | HU Matthew | V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 10 | INTRIAGO Erick | V V V V | V V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 11 | PAK Charles | V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 12 | GAU Edward Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | SECRETI Steven | D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 14 | FENG Kevin T. | D D V V V D V | V | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 15 | PORTMORE-DAVIES Beinean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | GOLDSMITH Colby Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | LI Brian | V V V | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 | |
| 18 | SINGCUENCO Lance | V D | V | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 19 | GARVEY Sean | D V V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 20 | STANLEY Dominick | V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | HURDAL Leif G. | V V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 22 | MCGEE Mike Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | TAICH Brian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | PRODIGALIDAD Nolan A. | D V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 | |
| 25 | CAPUTO Frankie | D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 26 | MURPHY Matt Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | ZUKOFSKY Zachary | V D D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | XIAO Kenneth D. | D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 29 | TUCKER Riley | V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | ZENDER Matt Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | LEWIS Chauncey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | CIESLAK Sebastian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | BRAR Ajay | D V V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 | |
| 34 | WANG Charlie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | MATHEWS Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | RAPPAPORT Cory | V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 37 | SCHMIDKE Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | CHEN ZeYu Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | MURRAY-COPPOLONE James | V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 40 | CANO Christopher | V D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 | |
| 41 | LEWIS William E. | D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 42 | MAY Evan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | JONES Eli Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | COFFEY John Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | BRADLEY Ryan E. | D D D V | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 46 | MORRISON Bryce | D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 47 | DOUGAL Connor | V D V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 48 | NEILSON Kimball Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | FUENTES Jon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | WEISSMANN Ben Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | IDE Kumpu Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | FLEISHMAN Dennis Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | YANG Christopher | V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 54 | CHOE Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | RODRIGUEZ John | D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
| 56 | CHIU James A. | D V D D D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
| 57 | ZHANG William | D D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 58 | CHIN Ethan | D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 59 | SNIT Alex Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | SANTANA Elijah | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.