Guilford High School - Guilford, CT, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BROWN Cameryn | V D V V | V V V | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 2 | COLE Alex | V V V V | V V V V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 3 | LOGAN Jade | V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 4 | SMITH Lindsey | V V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 5 | YANG Willow Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | LEVANDOSKI Elizabeth | D V D V | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 7 | VANSTEENBERGEN Megan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | MEYER Claudia | D V D V | V V V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 9 | PROVENCHER Sydney | V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 10 | FREDERICKS Madison | V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | WAWRZYNOWICZ Raven | V D V D | V | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 12 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | V D V D | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 13 | WOLF Alexandra | V V V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 14 | HUIE Calah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | CONTRERAS Amy | V D V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 16 | LIU Qinge | D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 17 | COLON-DAVILA Mayangelie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | WALLACE Susannah | V V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 19 | NAKANISHI Alexa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | TARINELLI Emily | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - | |
| 21 | WINIGER-SIEVE Taylor Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | BAMGBOYE Lizabeth | V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 23 | ANDERSON Shannon | D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | JANNACCIO Morgan | V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | DODGE Skylar | V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | KHAN Razaan | D V V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 27 | PECOR Jessica | V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | LUSCOMB Julia | D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | BOYCE Alexandra | D V V | V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 30 | RAUCCIO Genna | D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 31 | GATCHALIAN Jerelyn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | HOLT Allison Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | BROOKHART Olivia | V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 34 | DARROW Lucinda | V V D V | 3.0 | 3 | - | |
| 35 | PARROTT Katelyn | V D D V | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 | |
| 36 | SIZER Courtney | V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 36 | DAVIS Julia | D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 38 | MUSCHINSKY Cora | V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 39 | REDMAN Eva Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | ATKINSON Juliette Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | PAN Anna | D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 41 | ALINA Jasmine | V V D D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 43 | MARIANO Franchella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | VACARRO Nikki Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | DELEVIE Amanda | D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 45 | ZHANG Angela | D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 47 | LOONEY Claire Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | BONNASSIEUX Sophie | D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | TUNNEY Kaitlyn | D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 50 | KIM Autumn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | ZHANG Xingyang | V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 52 | MALDONADO Anna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | BROWN Liah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | SHEIN Evita | D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 55 | RUSER Sophia | D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 56 | TROUT Madison | D V D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 57 | SCHANZ Isabella (Izzy) | D D V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
| 58 | YANG Cecil Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | MADDEN McKayla | D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 59 | WEBER Stephanie | D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 61 | WONG Olivia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | DIFILIPO Madelyn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 63 | WELLES Michaela | D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.