Guilford High School - Guilford, CT, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BROWN Cameryn | V D V V | V V V | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 2 | COLE Alex | V V V V | V V V V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 3 | LOGAN Jade | V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 4 | SMITH Lindsey | V V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 6 | LEVANDOSKI Elizabeth | D V D V | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 8 | MEYER Claudia | D V D V | V V V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 9 | PROVENCHER Sydney | V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | WAWRZYNOWICZ Raven | V D V D | V | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 12 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | V D V D | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 13 | WOLF Alexandra | V V V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 15 | CONTRERAS Amy | V D V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 16 | LIU Qinge | D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 18 | WALLACE Susannah | V V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 20 | TARINELLI Emily | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - | |
| 22 | BAMGBOYE Lizabeth | V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 23 | ANDERSON Shannon | D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | JANNACCIO Morgan | V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | DODGE Skylar | V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | KHAN Razaan | D V V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 27 | PECOR Jessica | V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | LUSCOMB Julia | D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | BOYCE Alexandra | D V V | V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 30 | RAUCCIO Genna | D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 33 | BROOKHART Olivia | V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 34 | DARROW Lucinda | V V D V | 3.0 | 3 | - | |
| 35 | PARROTT Katelyn | V D D V | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 | |
| 36 | SIZER Courtney | V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 36 | DAVIS Julia | D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 38 | MUSCHINSKY Cora | V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 41 | PAN Anna | D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 41 | ALINA Jasmine | V V D D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 45 | DELEVIE Amanda | D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 45 | ZHANG Angela | D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | BONNASSIEUX Sophie | D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | TUNNEY Kaitlyn | D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 51 | ZHANG Xingyang | V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 54 | SHEIN Evita | D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 55 | RUSER Sophia | D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 56 | TROUT Madison | D V D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 57 | SCHANZ Isabella (Izzy) | D D V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
| 59 | MADDEN McKayla | D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 59 | WEBER Stephanie | D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 63 | WELLES Michaela | D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.