The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

CT State High School Individual Championships 2020

Men's Épée

Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 9:00 AM

Guilford High School - Guilford, CT, CT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 MARCHANT Albert J. V D V V V V V V V V 4.5 4 -0.5
2 ALFAIATE Lucas V V V V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
3 BELLIVEAU Raven C. V V V V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
4 MACNEIL Drew A. V V V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
5 SINGH Laekhram V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
7 COTAJ Andrew V D V V V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
8 MCCREA Jack D V V V D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
9 MORSE Tyler V V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
10 RILEY Aidan V V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
12 LIVELY David D V V V D 1.3 2 +0.7
13 CARTY Zeb V V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
14 JENNINGS Adin V D V D V 1.7 2 +0.3
15 BENINI Alexander J. V V D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
16 CHESNEY Aiden R. D V D D D V V D 3.5 1 -2.5
17 RADULOVIC Milan A. V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
18 HIGGINS Benjamin D V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
20 STALL-RYAN Jonathan V V V D V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
21 REIGELSPERGER Gabe D V V V V D 1.5 4 +2.5
22 PAGE Duncan V V D D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
23 KEMPTON Owen D V D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
24 MERENDA Evan D D V V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
25 MATLOCK Jackson D V V D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
26 LEBLANC Adam V D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
27 SMEDLEY Drew N. D D D V V V 2.7 2 -0.7
28 RICHARDS William D V D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
30 COTLIER Sean D D V D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
31 GREINER Jack V D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
32 CUNNINGHAM Max D D D V D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
33 REGONDOLA Jonathan V V V V D D 3.7 4 +0.3
34 GIRARDI Brian V V V D V D 1.9 4 +2.1
35 MENDOZA Alejandro V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
36 WILMOT Cody V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
38 RAUCCI Alfred (AJ) V V V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
39 DENMARK Xavier D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
40 BARTLETT William V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
41 MERCEDES Raymond D V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
42 ROWE Jason D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
43 DALY Andrew V D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
44 HENDON Liam D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
45 FEAGIN Patrick D D V V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
46 GRIFFIN Tanner D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
47 URQUHART Benjamin D D D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
49 CROSLAND Hashin D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
51 MCCALL Aidan V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
53 ANDERSON Alaric D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
55 PIERCE Orrin D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
56 ROBERTS Dylan V D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
57 PATEL Dev D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
59 TRUJILLO Joshua D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
60 HANSON Mathew D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
62 ZUROWSKI Xander D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
64 MENDEZ Oscar D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
65 SALINAS Yojanan D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.