Guilford High School - Guilford, CT, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | VINE Melissa | V V V V | V V V V V | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 2 | GANGEMI Julia | V V V D | V V V V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 3 | BANNING Grace | V V V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 4 | GLASSMAN Sophie | V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 5 | HARDGROVE Jade | V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 6 | MORIN Jenna | V V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 7 | ZIEMINSKI Julia | V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | ASNES Caroline | V V D | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 9 | BALSKUS Sophia | V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 10 | LI Amy | V V V D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 11 | ALEXANDER-MACKIN Willow Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | BATTLE Eryn | D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 13 | SANG Ruohan | D V V V | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 14 | MULLINS Lily | D D V V | V V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 15 | JUONI Jessica | V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 16 | KOZAK Lillian (Barbara) | V D D D | V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 17 | MCINTYRE Ellen Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | GOU Jenny | V V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 19 | COTE Kat | V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 20 | FIGUEROA Hailey | V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 21 | WILHELM Marsela | V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | LESNIK Alexandra | D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 23 | BARRY Madison | D V D V | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 | |
| 24 | MCCARTHY Natasha Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | LIMAURO Mary | V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 26 | APPLEBEE Andralyn | D V D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 27 | SYLVIA Morgan | V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | BARANOSKY Grace | D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 29 | AKBAS Lara Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | PESTEY Alli K. | D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | VEGA Lorena Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | TOMA Nwall Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | MORRISSEY Lilly | D D V V | 2.0 | 2 | - | |
| 34 | SCROGGINS Lila | D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 35 | GOOLCHARREN Ariana Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | READING Megan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | TREAT Amelia | D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | WANG Angel | D V D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 39 | JUHOLA Megan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | ZIELINSKI Kayley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | SMITH Lily J. | D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 42 | MANOS Bailey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | SMINKEY Ashlyn | D D D V | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
| 44 | KELLOGG Patti Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | BEEBE Heidi | D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 46 | BOSQUE Samantha Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | BARRON Gina | D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 48 | ST. PETER Isabella | D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 49 | GRIFFOR Tessa | D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 49 | NUTERANGELO Sophia | V D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
| 51 | BENOIT Victoria Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | BIAGETTI Mariah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | MAIN Brooke | D D D V | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
| 54 | WARRINGTON Thomasina | D V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 | |
| 55 | ORPHANOS Alexandra Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | BUNKELMAN Amelia | D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
| 57 | DARMAWAN Tiffany | D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| 58 | OUKASSI Yousra | D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 59 | DEGUZMAN Jaimee | D D D D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.