San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RAJA Arnav | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% | |
2 | SINGER Carson | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
3 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
3 | XU William | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
5 | BLINKOV Andrey | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
6 | CHEN Howard | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
7 | FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 7% |
8 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
9 | KHAVANDI Soheil | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
10 | PARKEY Jack O. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
10 | HASNAH Henry | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
12 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
13 | COVINGTON Max G. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
14 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
15 | SUORSA Markus | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
16 | YEARLING Matthew | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
17 | ANDERSON Ian | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
18 | MAHONEY Daniel M. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
19 | CHUPKIN Nikolas | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
20 | GRIFFIN Nicholas D. | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
21 | FAN Wengronghao | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
22 | FLORES Peter D. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
23 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
24 | BAILEY Nate | 3% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
26 | ELLIS Steven | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
27 | ALKIN Isaac | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
28 | PROCHAZKA Archer R. | 1% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
30 | HAGA Alexander | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
31 | STONE Esmond A. | 2% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | LIU Christopher X. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
33 | HOLZ William A. | 1% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
34 | FEDKIW Olivier | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
35 | HODGES Calvin | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | KIM Ryan | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
37 | YEARLING Ethan | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
39 | DHANANI Zain | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
40 | CHANG Lawrence | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.