San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RAJA Arnav | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% | |
| 2 | SINGER Carson | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 3 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
| 3 | XU William | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 5 | BLINKOV Andrey | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 6 | CHEN Howard | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 7 | FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 7% |
| 8 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 9 | KHAVANDI Soheil | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 10 | PARKEY Jack O. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 10 | HASNAH Henry | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 13 | COVINGTON Max G. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 14 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | SUORSA Markus | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | YEARLING Matthew | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | ANDERSON Ian | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | MAHONEY Daniel M. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | CHUPKIN Nikolas | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | GRIFFIN Nicholas D. | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 21 | FAN Wengronghao | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 22 | FLORES Peter D. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | BAILEY Nate | 3% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | ELLIS Steven | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | ALKIN Isaac | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
| 28 | PROCHAZKA Archer R. | 1% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | HAGA Alexander | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 31 | STONE Esmond A. | 2% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIU Christopher X. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HOLZ William A. | 1% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | FEDKIW Olivier | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 35 | HODGES Calvin | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | KIM Ryan | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | YEARLING Ethan | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | DHANANI Zain | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | CHANG Lawrence | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.