San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | GHAYALOD Reya | - | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 42% |
2 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
3 | LIN Lauren | - | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
3 | CHIN Elise | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
5 | EVANS Madelynn | - | 2% | 11% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
6 | TSE Angelina | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
7 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | < 1% | - | - | |
8 | TONG Jessie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
9 | TUNG Renee | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
10 | XA-CHIN Sara | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
11 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | 1% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
12 | REGANTI Sitara | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
13 | LIU Sydney | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | SHAPONA Lillian | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - | |
15 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 1% | 5% | 16% | 28% | 29% | 17% | 5% | - |
16 | LI Chengxuan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - | |
17 | CAPLICE Ella | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - | |
18 | LEE Arissa | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
19 | PYO Penelope E. | - | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
20 | BARBUTA Aden | 5% | 19% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
21 | NAVILLE France | 6% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
22 | DOWLING Ruby | 9% | 49% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.